Politics, understood through philosophy and history

Why political orders come apart

People have argued about this for 2,200 years, and they still haven't converged. This is the tradition laid out properly: what each of them actually claimed, in their own terms, and the objection none of them answered.

The pillar

Why civilisations fall: from Polybius to Turchin

The tradition splits three ways: decay as moral failure, decay as structure, and the refusal to treat "a civilisation" as the sort of thing that can fall. A survey from Polybius's Book VI to Turchin's theory of elite overproduction, with a verdict.

Read it

The thinkers

One argument at a time

Six essays, each around fifteen hundred words, ending with the criticism its subject never answered.

c. 150 BC · Greek

Polybius and anakyklosis, the cycle of constitutions

Every simple regime decays into its own worst version, in a fixed order. Rome held the cycle off for a while by mixing all three at once.

Polybius, Histories VI
1377 · Tunis and Cairo

Ibn Khaldun on why dynasties die in four generations

Political power rests on solidarity forged by hardship. Cities dissolve it, comfort finishes the job, and a dynasty lasts about four generations.

Ibn Khaldun, Muqaddimah
c. 1517 · Florence

Machiavelli and the ten-year cure for corruzione

Rome stayed free because its classes fought openly. Machiavelli read conflict as maintenance rather than disease, which nobody else was willing to say.

Machiavelli, Discourses on Livy
1918 · Munich

Oswald Spengler on why political orders decay

The most famous book of decline of the last century, and the one to handle with tongs. What the morphology claimed, why specialists rejected it, and who picked it up afterwards.

Spengler, The Decline of the West
1930 · Madrid

Ortega y Gasset and the hombre-masa

The mass-man is a temperament rather than a class: the person who enjoys a civilisation without asking what maintains it, and who appears in the professions as often as anywhere.

Ortega y Gasset, The Revolt of the Masses
1988 · Archaeology

Joseph Tainter and the cost of complexity

Complexity is a problem-solving strategy with diminishing returns. When they go negative, collapse stops being a catastrophe and becomes the rational option.

Tainter, The Collapse of Complex Societies
What this is

The writing arm of a Discord community that argues about this nightly

Politics & Philosophy has been around since March 2019 and now has around 1,200 members. A chat window is a bad place for a long argument, so the longer ones live here.

Every date and title on this site is checked against primary texts and standard reference works before publication, and the About page explains exactly how, including what is machine-assisted. The glossary covers the vocabulary, from asabiyya to elite overproduction.

He who knows only his own side of the case, knows little of that.
John Stuart Mill, On Liberty, 1859. The closest thing we have to a house rule.